Review



mouse anti pparγ  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Proteintech mouse anti pparγ
    Mouse Anti Pparγ, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 695 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPAR+gamma+Polyclonal+antibody/pmc12848019-565-47-53
    Average 96 stars, based on 695 article reviews
    mouse anti pparγ - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Chemotherapy-induced adipo-lineage cell senescence drives bone loss.
    Article Snippet: .. Sections were washed, permeabilized for 10 min in 0.2% Triton-X in PBS and blocked for 1 h at room temperature using 0.5% BSA (Sigma, D9663) with Fc blocker (1:200) prior to incubation for overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti–p16 antibody (1:100, Cat. No. PA1-46220, Invitrogen) and mouse anti-PPAR (1:300, Cat. No. 66936-1, Proteintech). ..



    Similar Products

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti ppar γ monoclonal antibody
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Mouse Anti Ppar γ Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPAR%CE%B3+Antibody/pmc12787804-210-34-38
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti ppar γ monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech mouse anti pparγ
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Mouse Anti Pparγ, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPAR+gamma+Polyclonal+antibody/pmc12848019-565-47-53
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti pparγ - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech mouse anti ppar
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Mouse Anti Ppar, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPARA+Antibody/pm41469373-386-47-53
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti ppar - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech mouse monoclonal anti ppar γ antibody
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Ppar γ Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPARG+Antibody/pm41380676-429-31-39
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti ppar γ antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology ppar α mouse monoclonal igg
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Ppar α Mouse Monoclonal Igg, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPAR%CE%B1+Antibody/pm41321257-43-22-36
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ppar α mouse monoclonal igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse polyclonal anti ppar γ
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Mouse Polyclonal Anti Ppar γ, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPARgamma+Mouse+mAb/pmc12565869-49-21-25
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse polyclonal anti ppar γ - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology ppar γ mouse monoclonal igg
    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.
    Ppar γ Mouse Monoclonal Igg, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ppar/PPAR%CE%B3+Antibody/pm40581833-38-9-31
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ppar γ mouse monoclonal igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.

    Journal: Molecules

    Article Title: Effects of Chlorogenic Acid on Cellular Senescence in an In Vitro Model of 3T3-L1 Murine Adipocytes

    doi: 10.3390/molecules31010167

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of chlorogenic acid on adipogenesis. Here, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with H 2 O 2 (100 μM) on days 5, 6, and 7 of the differentiation process for three hours, followed by CGA exposure (5, 10, or 20 μM). Cells cultured with the differentiation medium containing the CGA vehicle alone (0.1% v / v DMSO) were used as controls. ( A ) Representative images of Oil Red O staining (original magnification at ×40—scale bar 50 µm) in control cells (CTR) and in cells exposed to H 2 O 2 and treated or not with CGA. ( B ) Cell lipid accumulation was expressed as relative content vs. control cells. ( C ) PPARγ protein expression was analyzed by Western blot. The densitometry results are reported as fold changes compared to control cells. The values were normalized to the corresponding β-actin value. ( D ) FASN gene expression value was expressed as 2 −ΔΔCt and normalized against control cells. 18S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. All results are reported as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars represent S.D. a p < 0.01 vs. control cells; c p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 ; d p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; e p < 0.01 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 5 μM; f p < 0.05 vs. H 2 O 2 + CGA 10 μM.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were then blocked using 5% non-fat dry milk solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following specific primary antibodies: rabbit anti-Lamin B1 monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) (1:1000), mouse anti-PPAR-γ monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) (1:1500), rabbit anti-PI3K p85 monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), mouse anti-p21 (Waf1/Cip1) monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1:500), mouse anti-phospho-p53 (Ser15) monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-Bax monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-Bcl-2 monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-Phospho-Akt (Ser473) monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-GLUT-4 monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:1000), rabbit anti-NF-κB p65 polyclonal antibody (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) (1:1000), mouse anti-COX-2 monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1:500), and rabbit anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) (1:6000).

    Techniques: Cell Culture, Staining, Control, Expressing, Western Blot, Gene Expression